|

The diagrams in the box-out below show just
some of the effects that the harmful ElectroMagnetic Rays (EMR)
are doing through simple everyday use of your cellphones and cordless
phones. The diagrams show only a graphical representation of the radiation
that is emitted from the phone while it is in use but do not show the
dramatic after effects from this usage, including links to brain cancer,
leukaemia and memory loss among others.
This page also includes just a few of the published
reports from various global research programs and laboratories which
not only explain the harm that cellphones and cordless phones are doing,
but also explain the way in which SafeTShield prevents
these harmful rays from penetrating the brain through the ear canal.
|
Without
SafeTShield protecting the ear canal
|
With
SafeTShield installed on the cellphone
|
|
|
As the "human ear canal" has no natural protection
from possible exposure to EMR, there exists a 100% risk of exposure
to potentially harmful EMR (Electro-Magnetic Radiation) emitted
from the earpiece area of cellular phones. (While other areas
of cellular phones have been shown to also emit EMR, the earpiece
area has the only "direct/unprotected, physical access"
into he ear canal, which as well, channels into the brain).
|
In certain tests, up to 99% of EMR waves have been significantly
minimized and drastically reduced in energy.
The 1% of radiation that remains is necessary for the cellphone
and cordless phones to operate and the exposure to this 1% is
not considered a risk.
|
| Disclaimer:
This Image is intended and displayed as a suggested graphic representation
only. It simply provides a graphic representation of how EMR energy
waves traveling into the human ear canal from the earpiece area
of a cellular phone, may potentially penetrate and be absorbed into
that limited area of the brain, which is in close proximity of the
ear canal. ( Image is not represented to be either medically nor
clinically correct or exact. It is only provided as a visual-aide
for demonstrating the potential EMR exposure possibilities into
the ear canal and brain area, resulting from earpiece exposure from
an "unshielded" cellular/mobile phone. |
|
SAR
Test: Czech Technical University Prague, Electrotechnics Institute
|
The
Coghill Biological Test: Coghill Research Laboratories, Gwent-Wales
U.K
|
|
The SAR Test is a Standardized Test with laboratory and equipment
variables, for the purpose of measuring "… the actual Specific
Absorption Rate of ElectroMagnetic or RF (Radio Frequency) Radiation
Fields into human body tissue (or other organic structures or
organisms) with measurement values based on comparisons of: Subject
Volume Whole Body Weight (local mass & density, in this case the
entire human body) vs. EMR/RF Power Density (or EMR/RF actual
power source;, in this case a standard 900MHz-USA or, 1800 MHz-EURO-Cell-Phone)."
SafeTShield™ was tested in August of 2000 at Czech Technical
University at Prague, Electrotechnics Institute, one of the foremost
Institutes in the world for Electromagnetic Studies and a leading
facility for SAR Test applications and evaluations. The scientific
and academic test protocols were administered by the three lead
scientists at the Institute who are preeminent in the world in
the field of EMR and Radio Frequency studies; Doc. Ing. Boris
Cimak CSc, Dr. PhD Richard Doughly, and Professor Yaraslov Vokurraka.
The SAR Test conclusions for SafeTShield™ were quite dynamic.
In fact the scientific group collectively acknowledged that the
SafeTShield™ device tested at a greater efficiency in its SAR
Value performance than any other EMR shielding device for cellular
phones previously reviewed by the Institute. In the actual Test
Conclusion…the Institute went on to state "… Based on the performed
measurement, we can fully recommend the usage of the tested device,
SafeTShield™."
|
The COGHILL Test was an actual biological
test protocol conducted on SafeTShield™, using human blood
samples (white blood cells) as the subject, and resulting comparisons
between blood cell conditions in 2 control groups
- GROUP-1 Blood Sample exposed
to EMR Field power source, i.e.; 900 MHz Cellular Phone, without
shielding or protection whatsoever.
- GROUP-2 Blood Sample exposed
to EMR Field power source, i.e. 900 MHz Cellular Phone, WITH
EMR SHIELDING DEVICE, product device known as SafeTShield.
Results & Conclusion: Roger Coghill,
Director & Head of Research concluded that GROUP-1 Unprotected
Cells suffered severe damage from direct unchecked EMR exposure.
In fact, as Coghill stated in his own words…"the white blood cells
crashed, they actually died." However, GROUP-2 Protected Cells
(via SafeTShield™ device attached to the power source cellular
phone), Coghill said "the protected white blood cells remained
quite viable, healthy and normal." The resulting conclusion was
that SafeTShield™ is indeed a remarkably safe and effective
device, tested and proven so in his (Coghill’s) own laboratories,
and he went on to say "… that’s why I now use a SafeTShield™ on
my own cell phone."
|
|
KEC
Test: Ikoma Testing Laboratory, Osaka Japan
|
|
| The KEC Test procedure
is devised to effectively measure the quantitative protective shielding
capabilities of a device or system in relation to its exposure to
EMR waves produced by a designated power source; (in this case a
900MHz Cell Phone). The KEC Test is a scientific test application
which concludes actual physical and mechanical frequency measurements,
and accordingly based on the recorded reductions of EM Frequency,
effectively determines a specific percentage decay (or shielding
effect) in EMR Transmission; in the case of the SafeTShield™
EMR Shielding product, the overall measured decay resulted in a
consistent, effective average reduction of 99% of the EMR produced
by the subject power source, cellular phones; including a range
from 700MHz, 900MHz, and 1900MHz the designated Euro-Frequency.
(The KEC Test and respective administering laboratory Ikoma Testing
Laboratory, is an NVLAP (National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation
Program) accredited test site. |
|
|